Julian Ungar-Sargon

  • Home
  • Theological Essays
  • Healing Essays
  • Podcast
  • Poetry
  • Daf Ditty
  • Deep Dive Ditty
  • Videos
  • Publications
  • Military Service
  • Dominican University
  • Home
  • Theological Essays
  • Healing Essays
  • Podcast
  • Poetry
  • Daf Ditty
  • Deep Dive Ditty
  • Videos
  • Publications
  • Military Service
  • Dominican University
Julian Ungar-Sargon copy 3.jpg

Daf Ditty

A wide-ranging commentary on the daily page of Talmud.

Royal Palm tom. Photo credit: Cristian Rojas, Los Muertos Crew

Chullin 62: כֹּל שֶׁנִּשְׁתַּנָּה שְׁמוֹ קוֹדֶם מַתַּן תּוֹרָה

jyungar July 1, 2026

For the source text click/tap here: Chullin 62

To download, click/tap here: PDF

Unlike the case with mammals and fish, where the Torah gives identifying characteristics by which kosher and non-kosher types can be discerned, the Torah gives no such signs for birds. Instead, the Torah lists various types of non-kosher birds. Since these are the ones specified as being non-kosher, all the ones not listed are ipso facto kosher. That sounds straightforward enough, but there complications.

The Gemara indicates that simanim are sufficient to determine a bird’s kashrus, regardless of a tradition.

However, Rashi writes that simanim can be difficult to ascertain, and therefore rules that no bird may be assumed to be a min tahor unless it has a reliable mesorah. This view, set by Rashi, has been adopted by several rishonim and ultimately brought l’halacha by the Mechaber[5] and the Rama,[6] making the case for the turkey’s kashrus more challenging.

We focus on the turkey, the “Hindik” and the halachic problems it presents.

Tags75th
  • Daf Ditty
  • Older
  • Newer

Julian Ungar-Sargon

This is Julian Ungar-Sargon's personal website. It contains poems, essays, and podcasts for the spiritual seeker and interdisciplinary aficionado.​