For the source text click/tap here: Menachoot 60
To download, click/tap here: PDF
Aside from the different ingredients that may have been included in meal offerings, as described in the Mishna on yesterday’s daf, there also were different activities that were done to the menaḥot as part of the ceremonial Temple service, not all of which applied to each meal offering. Specifically, the two activities were hagasha – bringing the offering to the altar – and tenufa – lifting or “waving” the offering.
The Mishna on our daf teaches –
Some meal offerings require hagasha – bringing near to the altar -but not tenufa – waving – some require bringing near to the altar and also waving, some require waving but not bringing near to the altar, and some require neither bringing near to the altar nor waving.
The sugya investigates several interrelated questions:
1. Why do certain meal offerings require hagashah while others do not?
2. What is the relationship between kemitzah (the removal of a handful) and hagashah?
3. How do scriptural derivations expand the requirement of hagashah to various types of offerings?
4. What conceptual principles underlie the distinctions between voluntary offerings (nedavah) and obligatory offerings (chovah)?
Through the debates between the Tanna Kama, Rabbi Shimon, Rabbi Yehuda, and the baraita, the Talmud articulates an intricate legal theory of sacrificial procedure. The classification of offerings becomes a lens through which broader issues of ritual logic and hermeneutics emerge.