For the source text click/tap here: Bava Kama 75
To download, click/tap here: PDF
As we have seen (daf 64b) in cases where a thief is obligated to pay kenas – the penalties of two, four or five times the value of the stolen object (over and above returning the object or its value to his victim) – if the thief steps forward and admits his guilt, then he will only need to return the object (or pay back its value); he will not have to pay the penalty – in the language of the Gemara, “Modeh b’knas patur.”
While this ruling is accepted by all, there is a difference of opinion whether this will be true even if other witnesses testify against him. Rav believes that even if witnesses are found who can testify about this situation, once the thief has admitted his guilt, he is free from any obligations to pay the penalty. (Steinsaltz)
We examine the Rambam’s reasoning as to the fine paid for thievery then the scholarship of Prof Joel Kraemer (d.2018) on reading the Moreh Nevuchim and its pitfalls.