For the source text click/tap here: Yevamot 71
To download, click/tap here: PDF
The eighth perek, which begins on our daf, continues the discussion of teruma, and teaches about cases where a kohen may not be allowed to eat teruma, and yet his wife will be able to do so because of their marriage.
One example of such a case is an arel – an uncircumcised kohen – who cannot eat teruma himself, even though a woman who marries him will be permitted to eat teruma, by virtue of the fact that she has married a kohen. After all, a kohen who is uncircumcised is still a full kohen, he just needs a brit mila – without which he cannot eat teruma. According to the Gemara, the source for the halakha that an arel cannot eat teruma is the word parallels between teruma and the Passover sacrifice where it is clearly stated that an arel cannot participate.
We further explore issues surrounding the history of circumcision from differing viewpoints (including a polemical essay by an 1891 physician) from biblical times to the possibility of welcoming uncircumcised to the flock (as essay by my son Eliyahu)