Sotah 29: דָּבָר שֶׁיֵּשׁ בּוֹ דַּעַת

For the source text click/tap here: Sotah 29

To download, click/tap here: PDF

The Gemara explains the need for two separate derivations concerning uncertain contractions of ritual impurity: And the derivation that Rav Giddel said that Rav said was necessary, and it was also necessary to derive the principle of uncertain ritual impurity from sota; since if it were derived only through the derivation of Rav, I would say that it makes no difference whether the uncertain contraction of impurity occurred in the private domain or whether it occurred in the public domain. Therefore, it was necessary to derive from sota that uncertain impurity is considered impure only in the private domain.

We further explain the rabbinic views on infidelity as a metaphor for the divine communal axis with a comparison with Paul’s theology in Romans 7 as well ass Daniel Boyarin’s cultural analysis.

Sotah 28: Tit for Tat

For the source text click/tap here: Sotah 28

To download, click/tap here: PDF

The first of the “Bo Bayom" teachings relates to the laws of Sota, where we find that Rabbi Akiva learns from passages in the parasha of Sota (see Bamidbar 5:12-31) that the “bitter waters” examine not only her behaviors, but his, as well.

Our Daf tell us that the woman who is accused of adultery after having been warned about seclusion is defiled in two different verses. Why? The rabbis consider the possibility that these defilements are in fact directed at the woman's husband and paramour as well as herself.

The rabbis speak about whether or not it makes a difference if the husband is also guilty of adultery. Or perhaps the husband is guilty of having intercourse with his wife on their way to the Temple when she is forbidden to him.

We explore the notion of the husband’s motive and guilt and a review of the novel The French Lieutenant’s Woman, and the obsessions of the paramour.

Sotah 27: בּוֹ בַּיּוֹם

For the source text click/tap here: Sotah 27

To download, click/tap here: PDF

Our Daf references one of the most dramatic stories in the Talmud, in which the rabbis come together to depose Rabban Gamliel as nasi (נשיא), or chief, of the rabbinic court.

Rabban Gamliel’s offense is the use of intimidation tactics to strengthen his own interpretations of Torah in the face of disagreement.

He actually has a history of acting in this way, particularly toward Rabbi Yehoshua, the second-highest ranking figure in the court and (perhaps) someone R. Gamliel saw as a threat to his own authority.

We explore the back story to the halachot decided on “that day” after his deposition.

Sotah 26: אִם כֵּן, יִסָּתְרוּ כׇּל הָעֲקָרוֹת

For the source text click/tap here: Sotah 26

To download, click/tap here: PDF

“And she shall be cleared, and shall conceive seed” (Numbers 5:28), indicates that if she was barren, she will be remembered and conceive a child; this is the statement of Rabbi Akiva.

Rabbi Yishmael said to him: If so, all the barren women will seclude themselves with other men, and they will be remembered and conceive after drinking the bitter water and being found innocent; but that virtuous barren woman, who does not transgress the prohibition of seclusion, since she does not seclude herself with other men, she loses the opportunity to receive this blessing.

We explore the threat of becoming a South to induce the promise of pregnancy.

Sotah 25: עוֹבֶרֶת עַל דָּת

For the source text click/tap here: Sotah 25

To download, click/tap here: PDF

Steinsaltz summarizes as follows:

Our Gemara discusses the case of overet al dat – a woman who violates the precepts of Jewish custom, asking whether she needs to be warned by her husband if he plans to divorce her without paying her ketuba. Can he simply divorce her, given her behavior, or must he warn her in order to give her the opportunity to rectify her behavior? After some discussion of the matter, the Gemara concludes that she needs to be warned.

specifically, as explained by the rishonim, when her actions bring her husband to transgress as well. Examples include feeding him non-kosher food or engaging in relations with him when she is a nidda and forbidden to him.

The case of overet al dat yehudit is where the woman engages in behaviors that are considered inappropriate for a Jewish married woman – for example, going out in public without a covering on her head.

We explore the dual nature of the Sota, both the water ritual and the oath ritual buried in the literary strata of the text.

Sotah 24: תּוֹרַת, הַקְּנָאֹת

For the source text click/tap here: Sotah 24

To download, click/tap here: PDF

Our mishnah deals with situations in which the woman, suspected of committing adultery, does not have the opportunity to drink the bitter waters, but rather she must be divorced and does not receive her ketubah.

The Torah uses the word “wife” (alternatively translated as woman) in summarizing the laws of the Sotah. From here the rabbis deduce that she must have the status of full wife in order to drink the bitter waters. A betrothed woman does not have such a status and hence, even if her fiancé forbids her from being secluded with a certain man and afterwards, she is secluded with him, she does not undergo the sotah ordeal. Similarly, a “shomeret yavam”, a woman whose husband died childless and is waiting for either levirate marriage (yibbum) or the release from levirate marriage (halitzah), does not drink the bitter waters.

We explore further the notion of the jealous husband.

Sotah 23: הִיא כְּכׇל הַמְּנָחוֹת

For the source text click/tap here: Sotah 23

To download, click/tap here: PDF

The next Mishnah lists the differences between men and women with regard to details of Mitzvos such as the procedure required by a woman who is a Metzora or a woman who is a Nezirah, the status of a son whose mother attempts to make him a Nazir, how a woman is punished with Sekilah, and how she is treated if she steals.

The Mishnah mentions only these differences because they are related to the Mishnah's discussion about the how to sacrifice the Minchah offering of a Kohen. The Mishnah says that when a Kohen donates a Minchah, there is a difference between the way the Minchah is offered when donated by a male Kohen and when donated by a female Kohenes. This difference is not a general difference between the Kohen and Kohenes. In contrast, all of the Mitzvos omitted by the Mishnah are general obligations and not matters of details about a Mitzvah.

We explore the korban minchah according to the Rambam and further understanding of rabbinic attitudes to adultery compared to Roman and Christian attitudes in the late antique period.

Sotah 22: Fake Frumkeit

For the source text click/tap here: Sotah 22

To download, click/tap here: PDF

Our dad teaches that there are seven types of perushin that fall into this category, the common thread among them is that these people are hypocrites who present themselves as God-fearing, religious people when in fact they are just putting on a show.

The perushin are the Pharisees, the sages of the Talmud, while the zedukim are the Sadducees, the elite class that rejected many of the traditions of the perushin.

Those who use the crown of Torah to further their personal objectives were the dangerous ones.

We explore the phenomenon of false piety and fake frumkeit.

Sotah 21: מְלַמְּדָהּ תִּיפְלוּת

For the source text click/tap here: Sotah 21

To download, click/tap here: PDF

Rabbi Eliezer said: If someone teaches his daughter Torah, he is teaching her lewdness. Tosfos cites a Yerushalmi which notes that Ben Azzai does not follow the exposition of Rabbi Elozar ben Azaryah. For it is written regarding the mitzvah of Hakhel that men, women, and children should assemble.

The Rambam rules that a woman who studies Torah receives reward, but not in the same capacity as a man. However, the Chachamim commanded a father not to teach Torah to his daughter, for women, in general, are not capable of understanding the intricacies and the fine details of the Torah, and it will lead them to incorrect halachic conclusions.

This admonition is only applicable to the Oral Law; however, with respect of the Written Law, one should not teach it to her, but if he does, it is not regarded as if he taught her lewdness.

We explore women’s learning from a number of perspectives.

Sotah 20: פַּחדְּאָ צמָיֵת, בּיִעתֲוּתאָ מרְפַּיְאָ

For the source text click/tap here: Sotah 20

To download, click/tap here: PDF

Steinsaltz writes:

According to the Mishna on our daf, if the sota is in fact guilty of adultery, after she drinks the “bitter water” her face will begin to turn green and her eyes will bulge out. At that point the people standing nearby immediately remove her from the Temple precincts lest she me-tameh the holy place.

The Gemara attempts to clarify what the fear of ritual defilement might be.

Abaye explains that the concern is that she might bleed and become a nidda.

The Gemara offers support to the idea that a sudden fear might cause a woman to become a nidda from the passage in Megillat Esther (4:4), which is understood by Rav to mean that Esther became a nidda upon hearing that Mordekhai was in sackcloth following Haman’s decree.

At the same time, the Gemara questions whether this is true, given the Mishna in Massekhet Nidda which teaches that fear stops a woman from menstruating. The Gemara’s explanation is that although a long-term fear may keep a woman from menstruating normally, a sudden shock may cause a woman to bleed.

We explore the evidence for the influence of stress and menstruation.

Sotah 19: כַּלְבּוֹס שֶׁל בַּרְזֶל

For the source text click/tap here: Sotah 19

To download, click/tap here: PDF

The priest would force the woman to drink the bitter water of a sota, and afterward he would sacrifice her meal-offering. Rabbi Shimon says: The priest would sacrifice her meal-offering and afterward he would force her to drink.

The Gemara asks: But does Rabbi Akiva in fact hold that the woman is forced to drink against her will? But isn’t it taught in a baraita (Tosefta 2:3) that Rabbi Yehuda says: A hook [kelabus] made of iron is forcibly placed into her mouth, so that if the scroll was erased and she said: I will not drink, she is forced to drink against her will.

We explore the use of coercion in forcing confessions in the talmud and in western law.

Sotah 18: “״אָמֵן״ ״אָמֵן

For the source text click/tap here: Sotah 18

To download, click/tap here: PDF

“Amen, amen” (Number 5:22), mentioned twice, why?

The mishna explains that it includes of the following: Amen on the curse, as she accepts the curse upon herself if she is guilty, and amen on the oath, as she declares that she is not defiled.

She states: Amen if I committed adultery with this man about whom I was warned, amen if I committed adultery with another man. Amen that I did not stray when I was betrothed nor after I was married.

We explore the double expression and the use of amen in liturgy and as an affirmative.

Sotah 17: תְּכֵלֶת דּוֹמֶה לַיָּם

For the source text click/tap here: Sotah 17

To download, click/tap here: PDF

The Gemara relates that in the merit of Avraham Avinu's declaration, "Im mi'Chut v'Ad Seroch Na'al" -- "I will not take from a thread to a sandal strap [and I will not take anything that is yours, lest you should say, 'I have made Avram rich']" (Bereishis 14:23), the Jewish people were rewarded with the Mitzvah of Techeles.

The Gemara asks what is unique about Techeles such that it was given as the reward for Avraham Avinu's statement. The Gemara answers with the words of Rebbi Meir who says that Techeles is unique because the color of Techeles "is similar to the sea, the sea is similar to the sky, and the sky is similar to the Kisei ha'Kavod," the throne of Hashem's glory.

We explore what is the significance of this comparison and where are we halachically with techies and the mystical significance of the color blue.

Sotah 16: צִפּוֹר דְּרוֹר

For the source text click/tap here: Sotah 16

To download, click/tap here: PDF

Rabbi Yishmael says that a Revi'is of water is used for a Metzora so that the blood of the bird will be discernible in the water.

A bird called Tzipor Dror is used in the purification of a Metzora.

D’ror Bird

Rabbi Yirmiyah inquired of Rabbi Zeira: What is the halachah if the bird is so large that its blood engulfs the water, or if the bird is so small that its blood is engulfed by the water? Rabbi Zeira replied: Have I not told you not to take yourself outside the halachic decisions (do not raise questions about exaggerated points)!

The Chachamim (when ruling that a revi’is of water is required) measured using a d’ror bird, and you will not find one that is so large that its blood will engulf the water, and you will not find one so small that its blood will be engulfed by the water!

We explore the relationship between pshat and Halacha,

with Martin Lockshin’s essay and the way early Christianity formed by interpretation of pshat…

Sotah 15: מַיִם חַיִּים

For the source text click/tap here: Sotah 15

To download, click/tap here: PDF

The mishnah starts to follow the order of the verses which describe the Sotah ritual in Numbers 5. Verse 15-17 and describes the minhah sacrifice (yesterday’s mishnah) and the water in the earthenware bowl, into which the name of God will be rubbed out.

The verse only says that the priest takes some water, but it does not say where he takes it from. The mishnah adds that it is taken from the laver.

There is a debate about how much water is to be put into the bowl, but in either case the amount of water is just sufficient to absolve the ink from God’s name. Rabbi Judah gives a smaller measurement for the water since he prescribes the least amount of writing (see tomorrow’s mishnah).

We explore the ritual through the lens of Andrew Durbin’s review of the secondary literature on the rabbinic including feminist readings.

Sotah 14: וְלאֹ־ידַָע֥ אִישׁ אֶת־קְבֻרָ֣ת֔וֹ

For the source text click/tap here: Sotah 14

To download, click/tap here: PDF

"the garrison [gastera] of Beth Peor and said to them: Show us where Moses is buried. As the men stood above on the upper section of the mountain, it appeared to them as if the grave was below in the lower section. As they stood below, it appeared to them to be above. They divided into two groups, one above and one below. To those who were standing above, the grave appeared to them to be below; to those who were standing below, the grave appeared to them to be above, “

Rabbi Chama the son of Rabbi Chanina says: Even Moshe our teacher does not know where he is buried. The verse here says: And no “Ish” – “man” knows his burial place. A different verse says: And this is the blessing that Moshe, the “Ish” Elokim – the man of God, blessed. [We see that Ish is used to refer to Moshe.]

We explore the death and site of burial of Moses from a literary and historical perspective.

Sotah 13: סֶרַח בַּת אָשֵׁר

For the source text click/tap here: Sotah 13

To download, click/tap here: PDF

The Gemara asks: And from where did Moses our teacher know where Joseph was buried? The Sages said: Serah, the daughter of Asher, remained from that generation that initially descended to Egypt with Jacob. Moses went to her and said to her: Do you know anything about where Joseph is buried? She said to him: The Egyptians fashioned a metal casket for him and set it in the Nile [Nilus] River as an augury so that its water would be blessed.

In the rabbinic imagination, Serah the granddaughter of Jacob survived not only into the days of Moses, David, and Rabbi Yohanan.

According to one very interesting line of tradition, she followed her people from the Land of Israel into the Babylonian Exile and continued her legendary existence there.

Despite the Talmudic tradition that Serah was granted immortality, the Persian Jews of the city of Isfahan believed that Serah bat Asher actually lived among them, until she died in a great synagogue fire in the 12th century CE.

Sotah 12: בַּת פַּרְעֹה

For the source text click/tap here: Sotah 12

To download, click/tap here: PDF

Pharaoh’s daughter recognized that Moses was an Israelite, perhaps because he was abandoned (Shadal, Hakham), or circumcised (Exodus Rabbah 1:24; Rashbam). This is the only place in Tanakh where a baby is said to be crying (since compassion is relevant to the plot). The Torah highlights Pharaoh’s daughter’s compassion with a crying baby, even though she knew of her father’s decree to drown Israelite baby boys!

We explore the identity of this rebellious daughter of the king of Egypt, Bittě-Yâ, daughter of Pharaoh (1 Chr 4,18), and possibly Bint(i)-ʿAnat, daughter of Ramesses II

Sotah 11: Egyptian Midwives

For the source text click/tap here: Sotah 11

To download, click/tap here: PDF

Continuing with the theme of reciprocity, where one's behaviour or words or thoughts leads to a complimentary consequence later in life, the rabbis examine some of the book of Exodus. In particular, they focus on the lives of Israelites while in Egypt, the Pharaoh, and the women mentioned in the story of the Exodus.

The Torah relates that Pharaoh, in his attempt to reduce the growth of the Jewish people and to eliminate the perceived threat of rebellion (Shemos 1:10), ordered the Jewish midwives (1:15) to kill every baby boy that was born (1:16). The Gemara relates that he taught them a way to discern when the expectant mothers were ready to give birth (so that they would not be able to give birth in secret and hide their babies; Rashi). Pharaoh also taught them how to discern whether the baby -- before it emerged from the womb -- was a boy or a girl. The Torah relates that the midwives "feared G-d" (1:17) and they did not kill the babies, but, on the contrary, they helped keep them alive.

Who were the midwives who risked their lives to save male Hebrew babies—Israelites or Egyptians? A text discovered at the Cairo Genizah sheds new light on this exegetical conundrum.

Sotah 10: Saul's Suicide

For the source text click/tap here: Sotah 10

To download, click/tap here: PDF

Continuing with the theme of middah ke-neged middah that was introduced by the Mishna (8b) that we studied earlier, our Gemara focuses on some of the characters who are presented by the Mishna (9b) as prime examples of people who suffered this fate.

The Sages taught in a baraita: Five individuals were created with a characteristic that is akin to a representation of the One on High, and they were all stricken by that characteristic.

Samson was glorified in his strength, Saul in his neck (see I Samuel 9:2), Absalom in his hair, Zedekiah in his eyes, and Asa in his feet.

Saul was smitten in his neck, as it is written:

“Then said Saul to his armor-bearer: Draw your sword and thrust me through with it; lest these uncircumcised come and thrust me through and make a mock of me. But his armor-bearer would not; for he was sore afraid. Therefore, Saul took his sword and fell upon it” ; he fell with his neck upon the sword.

We explore the story of death of Saul as it develops from the book of Samuel to Chronicles.