Chagigah 22: Appeasing the Am Ha’aretz

For the source text click/tap here: Chagigah 22

To download, click/tap here: PDF

The Gemora asks: And Amei Haaretz not believed regarding immersion? [Why is it necessary for the chaver to immerse the utensil after borrowing it?] Didn’t we learn in a braisa that an am ha-aretz is believed that an immersion was done in regard to corpse tumah?

Abaye answers: He is believed in respect to his body but not in regard to his utensils. Rava answers: He is believed to say that he never immersed one utensil inside another, but he is not believed to say that he immersed the utensil inside another one, but the opening was at least the size of a skin bottle’s tube.

The Gemora cites a braisa to support Rava: An am haaretz is believed that his produce is not in a state where it is susceptible to become tamei (it never got wet), but he is not believed to say that it was susceptible to become tamei, but it didn’t occur.

The Gemara continues its line of questioning. If so, we should likewise not accept sacrificial food from amei ha’aretz, since they are not sufficiently meticulous with ritual purity, and we should therefore not care if they immerse their vessels improperly.

The Gemara responds: The am ha’aretz will have feelings of antagonism if sacrificial food is not accepted from him, and this would lead to internal discord and conflict within Israel.

We explore the leniencies and the Pharisaic purity rituals that split the chaverim from the Amei haaretz using scholarly tools of analysis of these texts as well as the broader historical framework by the landmark research of Petuchowski.

Chagigah 21: כִּשְׁפוֹפֶרֶת הַנּוֹד

For the source text click/tap here: Chagigah 21

To download, click/tap here: PDF

As we learned in the first Mishnah in this perek (chapter) (see 20b), great care must be taken to ensure ritual purity in the cases of terumah (tithes) and kodashim (Temple sacrifices),

but the demands made regarding kodashim are greater than those having to do with terumah.

A Mishnah in Mikvaot is cited in our daf:

Mikvaot can be joined together [if their connection is as big] as the tube of a water-skin in thickness and in space, in which two fingers can be fully turned round.

The hole connecting the two mikvaot must be the size the tube of a water-skin, which is two fingerbreadths in width. As the mishnah explains, one must be able to put one's fingers in the tube and fully turn them around.

If there is a doubt [whether it is as big] as the tube of a water skin or not, it is invalid, because [this is a mitzvah] from the Torah.

If someone immerses in one of these mikvaot, and it alone has less than forty handbreadths and he is not sure whether the connection with the other mikveh is as big as the tube of a water-skin, he remains impure.

This is because the mitzvah to immerse in the mikveh is from the Torah and in cases of doubt concerning toraitic impurity, the law is strict.

We explore the construction of mikvaot and the recent Israeli Supreme Court has ruled that making women immerse under supervision is an invasion of privacy, so why must they fill out ‘permission slips’ to dip?

and the history of mikvah use in 20th century USA.

Chagigah 20: Purity Issues

For the source text click/tap here: Chagigah 20

To download, click/tap here: PDF

The third perek (chapter) of Masechet Chagigah, Homer ba-Kodesh, begins on our daf .

Its basic theme deals with a concept, repeated several times in the Torah:

the need to take great care when dealing with terumah (tithes) and kodashim (sacrifices), to ensure that they remain ritually pure.

Furthermore, the Torah commands that protective enactments be created to assist in this endeavor.

Also connected with this concept are the severe punishments meted out by the Torah to someone who eats terumah or kodashim while in a state of ritual defilement.

After reviewing Rav Aaron Lichtenstein’s landmark essay on learning Talmud we dive into underlying responses to purity/impurity as applied to the body and to food

and modern enlightenment struggles with legislating how women see their purity status.

Chagigah 19: Purifying Waves

For the source text click/tap here: Chagigah 19

To download, click/tap here: PDF

Steinzaltz summarizes perfectly:

"Generally speaking, in order for a person to rid himself of his ritually impure status, he must immerse in a mikvah, a natural body of water that contains a quantity of at least 40 se’ah. The Gemara on our daf concerns itself with situations where it is not clear whether the required 40 se’ah are in one place. For example, if a wave containing 40 se’ah comes crashing down on someone, that person would become tahor. In the water, however, only the parts of that same wave that are connected to the ocean – called rashin – can be used as a mikvah; the kippin, or top of the wave, is considered to be air and is thus not a kosher mikvah.”

We explore the notion of Phariseic purity laws and the poetics of waves, oceans and mikvah purity through the eye of recent poets.

Chagigah 18: Hand Washing (and its obsessions)

For the source text click/tap here: Chagigah 18

To download, click/tap here: PDF

From here until the end of the tractate the mishnah teaches laws of purity and impurity. The reason why these laws are here is that when Israel would come to Jerusalem and to the Temple for the festival they had to be pure in order to eat their sacrifices.

They would immerse their vessels to purify them before Yom Tov.

During the festival all of the people of Israel acted like the Pharisees and were extra stringent on eating only while in a state of ritual purity.

Our mishnah deals with the topic of washing hands versus washing one’s whole body.

We explore the halachos of netilat yadayim and their derivation from the Phariseeic stringencies.

We also look at the DSM III diagnosis of OCD as applied to hand washing and the fMRI brain imaging correlates recently found.

Can OCD apply to hand washing and other halachic observances and how has COVID hand washing guidelines affected or triggered those with OCD?

Chagigah 17: Beit Shammai, Beit Hillel

For the source text click/tap here: Chagigah 17

To download, click/tap here: PDF

In the Mishnah on our daf, Beit Shammai and Beit Hillel disagree about whether various sacrifices can be brought on Yom Tov. According to Bet Shammai, a korban olah, which is totally burned up, cannot be brought.

A korban shelamim, however, can be brought, since parts of it will be eaten by the kohanim and by the owner, making it not only a sacrifice, but also food preparation, which is permitted on Yom Tov. Nevertheless, they forbid performing semikha on the animal.

Bet Hillel permit both olot and shelamim to be brought since they are connected to the holiday, even though there is no obligation to bring them on the actual Yom Tov.

We explore the literature about Bet Hillel vs Bet Shammai from different literary perspectives including the use of their hermeneutic approaches in the recent divide in response to COVID19, between charedim and religious zionists, with an insightful article by Rabbi Aryeh Meir.

Chagigah 16: Zugot Controversies

For the source text click/tap here: Chagigah 16

To download, click/tap here:  PDF

Our Mishnah describes the very first disagreement between the Sages: should semikha – leaning on the animal being sacrificed as part of the preparation for the korban, or offering – be permitted on Yom Tov or not? We find no fewer than five generations of Sages listed as arguing this point, which leads Rav Shemen bar Abba to quote Rabbi Yochanan saying that even a shvut – Rabbinic ordinance – must be taken seriously. Semikha involves use of the animal (similar to riding a horse, for example) which is prohibited only on Rabbinic grounds, yet its status on Yom Tov is the topic of discussion for generations.

Aside from the general argument about semikha, we also find a disagreement with regard to women performing semikha when bringing a sacrifice. We explore this very first zugot controversy and the Zeitlin landmark article.

Chagigah 15: "Acher"

For the source text click/tap here: Chagigah 15

To download, click/tap here: PDF

As a continuation of the story of arba she-nikhnisu ba-pardes – four tannaim who embarked on the study of esoteric secrets of the Torah – our Gemara discusses the case of Acher, the Tanna Elisha ben Avuya, whose experience in the pardes led him to become a heretic. According to the Gemara, Acher peered into heaven and found the Archangel Mitatron who had received permission to sit down to write the merits of the Jewish people. From the midrashim it appears that Mitatron is the angel responsible for the entire world, and seeing him gave Acher the sense that there existed shetei reshuyot (two competing forces in heaven) – Mitatron and God – which was a common belief of Gnostic sects at that time.

Even after Elisha ben Avuya’s heresy, his student Rabbi Meir continued to study with him, and our Gemara relates a series of conversations that went on between them.

We explore the story of his apostasy and the history of scholarship on the parallel texts regarding his tragic end in Tosefta and Midrashim.

Milton Steinberg’s novel is a reconstruction of his biography which bears on the issues of theodicy and belief.

Chagigah 14: παράδεισος, Mystical Journeys

For the source text click/tap here: Chagigah 14

To download, click/tap here: PDF

The discussion of ma’aseh bereshit – the secrets of creation – continues with a description of the heavens.

The Gemara records that Rabbi Yehuda recognizes two heavens, while Reish Lakish enumerates seven heavens.

Back in daf 5 we had already learned: Rav Shmuel bar Inya said in the name of Rav: The Holy One, Blessed be He, has a place where He cries, and its name is Mistarim.

The Gemara asks: But is there crying before the Holy One, Blessed be He? Didn’t Rav Pappa say: There is no sadness before the Holy One, Blessed be He, as it is stated: “Honor and majesty are before Him; strength and gladness are in His place” (I Chronicles 16:27)? The Gemara responds: This is not difficult. This statement, that God cries, is referring to the innermost chambers, where He can cry in secret, whereas this statement, that He does not cry, is referring to the outer chambers.

On our daf, the Gemara asks: "And is there darkness before Heaven, i.e., before God? But isn’t it written: “He reveals deep and secret things, He knows what is in the darkness, and the light dwells with Him” (Daniel 2:22), demonstrating that only light, not darkness, is found with God?"

The Gemara answers: This is not difficult. This verse, which states that only light dwells with Him, is referring to the inner chamber/ houses, where there is only light; that source, according to which He is surrounded by darkness, is referring to the outer chamber/houses.

We explore the difference between the inner and outer chamber with the help of Eicha Rabba (Petichta 24) where Jeremiah and Metatron try to console the divine, whereupon He threatens to withdraw to the inner chamber and cry alone.

The Piacetzna Rebbe, in a startling sermon (Shabbes Parshe hachodesh 1942, Warsaw Ghetto) uses this midrash to forge a new theodicy...

Chagigah 13: God's Two Chambers

For the source text click/tap here: Chagigah 13

To download, click/tap here: PDF

The discussion of ma’aseh bereshit – the secrets of creation – continues with a description of the heavens.

The Gemara records that Rabbi Yehuda recognizes two heavens, while Reish Lakish enumerates seven heavens.

Back in daf 5 we had already learned: Rav Shmuel bar Inya said in the name of Rav: The Holy One, Blessed be He, has a place where He cries, and its name is Mistarim.

The Gemara asks: But is there crying before the Holy One, Blessed be He? Didn’t Rav Pappa say: There is no sadness before the Holy One, Blessed be He, as it is stated: “Honor and majesty are before Him; strength and gladness are in His place” (I Chronicles 16:27)? The Gemara responds: This is not difficult. This statement, that God cries, is referring to the innermost chambers, where He can cry in secret, whereas this statement, that He does not cry, is referring to the outer chambers.

On our daf, the Gemara asks: "And is there darkness before Heaven, i.e., before God? But isn’t it written: “He reveals deep and secret things, He knows what is in the darkness, and the light dwells with Him” (Daniel 2:22), demonstrating that only light, not darkness, is found with God?" The Gemara answers: This is not difficult. This verse, which states that only light dwells with Him, is referring to the inner chamber/ houses, where there is only light; that source, according to which He is surrounded by darkness, is referring to the outer chamber/houses.

We explore the difference between the inner and outer chamber with the help of Eicha Rabba (Petichta 24) where Jeremiah and Metatron try to console the divine, whereupon He threatens to withdraw to the inner chamber and cry alone.

The Piacetzna Rebbe, in a startling sermon (Shabbes Parshe hachodesh 1942, Warsaw Ghetto) uses this midrash to forge a new theodicy...

Chagigah 12: The Seven Firmaments

For the source text click/tap here: Chagigah 12

To download, click/tap here: PDF

The Mishnah (11b) taught that ma’aseh bereshit – the secrets of creation – can be taught only to a single student, while ma’aseh merkavah – the secrets of the supernatural – can only be taught to a single student, if he is a scholar who has the ability to understand on his own. How are the terms ma’aseh bereshit and ma’aseh merkavah to be understood?

The Gemara quotes Rebbi Yosi who says, "Woe to those who see but do not know what they see, and who stand but do not know upon what they stand." He proceeds to describe what supports the world. The world is supported by pillars, which are supported by water. The water is supported by mountains, which are supported by the wind (Ru'ach). The wind is supported by the tempest (Se'arah), which is supported by the mighty arm of the Holy One, Blessed is He.

Rav Yehudah says there are two levels of heaven, as the verse says that Hashem has both the shamayim – heaven and shmai hashamayim – the heaven of the heavens.

Raish Lakish lists 7 (vilon, rakia, shechakim, zevul, ma'on, machon, and aravos), and lists the function of each one.

We explore the ancient cosmology of Genesis via the lens of the Talmud and contrast with modern understandings of these heavenly bodies.

Chagigah 11: The Seven Firmaments

For the source text click/tap here: Chagigah 11

To download, click/tap here: PDF

The Mishnah (11b) taught that ma’aseh bereshit – the secrets of creation – can be taught only to a single student, while ma’aseh merkavah – the secrets of the supernatural – can only be taught to a single student, if he is a scholar who has the ability to understand on his own. How are the terms ma’aseh bereshit and ma’aseh merkavah to be understood?

The Gemara quotes Rebbi Yosi who says, "Woe to those who see but do not know what they see, and who stand but do not know upon what they stand." He proceeds to describe what supports the world. The world is supported by pillars, which are supported by water. The water is supported by mountains, which are supported by the wind (Ru'ach). The wind is supported by the tempest (Se'arah), which is supported by the mighty arm of the Holy One, Blessed is He.

Rav Yehudah says there are two levels of heaven, as the verse says that Hashem has both the shamayim – heaven and shmai hashamayim – the heaven of the heavens.

Raish Lakish lists 7 (vilon, rakia, shechakim, zevul, ma'on, machon, and aravos), and lists the function of each one.

We explore the ancient cosmology of Genesis via the lens of the Talmud and contrast with modern understandings of these heavenly bodies.

Chagigah 10: כַּהֲרָרִין הַתְּלוּיִין בִּשְׂעָרָה Mountains Suspended by a Hair

For the source text click/tap here: Chagigah 10

To download, click/tap here: PDF

Incidental to the Festival peace-offering, the mishna describes the nature of various areas of Torah study. The halakhot of the dissolution of vows, when one requests from a Sage to dissolve them, fly in the air and have nothing to support them, as these halakhot are not mentioned explicitly in the Torah. There is only a slight allusion to the dissolution of vows in the Torah, which is taught by the Sages as part of the oral tradition.

The halakhot of Shabbat, Festival peace-offerings, and misuse of consecrated property are like mountains suspended by a hair, as they have little written about them in the Torah, and yet the details of their halakhot are numerous.

We explore this metaphor through the reference of the Sifre and through the eyes of Professor Stephen Fraade and Michal Bar-Asher Siegal

who extend the metaphor to the entire project of extrapolating the oral law from the written, and the tools employed to derive.

Chagigah 9: מְעֻוּוֹת לֹא יוּכַל לִתְקוֹן וְחֶסְרוֹן לֹא יוּכַל לְהִמָּנוֹת

For the source text click/tap here: Chagigah 9

To download, click/tap here: PDF

On the three regalim – Pesach, Shavuot and Sukkot – one is obligated to bring an olat re’iya and a shalmei chagiga.

The Mishnah (1:6) teaches that if one does not offer the korbanot on the first day, he has the remaining days of the festival to offer these korbanot. We shall investigate this law, which is referred to as tashlumin.

When the Gemara questions the meaning of tashlumin it cites two opinions. R’ Yochanan maintains that the remaining days act to replace the first day while R’ Oshaya explains that each day compensate for another. In other words, according to R’ Yochanan the root obligation is to offer these korbanot on the first day. The remaining days are however available to fulfil that original obligation if it was not satisfied.

R’ Oshaya however maintains that each day carries its own independent obligation provided that the obligation was not fulfilled on the previous days. Demanding a practical difference between these views, the Gemara continues explaining that the case where one was lame on the first day of the festival but was then cured on the second, would be the subject of debate.

"One who did not celebrate [by bringing the korban chagigah] on the first day of the festival can celebrate on the remaining days, and even on the last day of Yom Tov (Shmini Azeret). If the holiday ends and he did not offer his sacrifice, he is no longer responsible for it. On this, it is said, 'that which is crooked cannot be straightened, and that which is missing cannot be counted'" (Kohelet 1:15, Chagigah 9a).

We explore the notion of tashlumin, when we can “make up” and when it cannot be fixed… both regarding offerings as well as harm done to us and harm done to others.

Are there sins that cannot be pardoned and how does one live with the unforgiven?

Chagigah 8: Simcha Without Meat?

For the source text click/tap here: Chagigah 8

To download, click/tap here: PDF

The mishna stated that Israelites fulfill their obligation to eat peace-offerings of rejoicing with their vow offerings and gift offerings. The Sages taught that the verse:

יד וְשָׂמַחְתָּ, בְּחַגֶּךָ: אַתָּה וּבִנְךָ וּבִתֶּךָ, וְעַבְדְּךָ וַאֲמָתֶךָ, וְהַלֵּוִי וְהַגֵּר וְהַיָּתוֹם וְהָאַלְמָנָה, אֲשֶׁר בִּשְׁעָרֶיךָ.

14 And thou shalt rejoice in thy feast, thou, and thy son, and thy daughter, and thy man-servant, and thy maid-servant, and the Levite, and the stranger, and the fatherless, and the widow, that are within thy gates.

Deut 16:14

“And you shall rejoice in your feast” comes to include all types of rejoicing as constituting a fulfillment of the mitzva of rejoicing. From here the Sages stated: Israelites fulfill their obligation to eat peace-offerings of rejoicing with their vow offerings and gift offerings and likewise with animal tithes.

Rav Ashi said: There is no need to derive this halakha from “And you shall rejoice in your feast” by explaining that the word feast is referring to the Festival peace-offering. Rather, this halakha is derived simply from the phrase “And you shall rejoice.” This excludes those bird-offerings and meal-offerings that do not have an element of rejoicing, as the joy of eating is provided only by animal meat.

We explore the halachic ramifications of simchah only with meat and the vegetarian vision for mankind struggles with these norms including Rav Kook’s unique approach to the future sacrifices.

Chagigah 7: מָה אֲנִי בְּחִנָּם, אַף אַתֶּם בְּחִנָּם

For the source text click/tap here: Chagigah 7

To download, click/tap here:  PDF

The verse states: “All your males shall appear.” Although the verse as written can be read: “Will see [yireh],” it is actually read: “Shall be seen [yera’e].” The baraita derives that just as I, God, come to see you for free, as He has no obligation to bring an offering when He comes to see us in the Temple, so too, you may come to see Me in the Temple for free, i.e., there is no requirement to bring an offering.

The Gemara accepts this objection and therefore proceeds to explain the dispute between Rabbi Yoḥanan and Reish Lakish in a different manner.

Hashem requires no fees for entrance to see Him, since He shows His face with no entrance fees...

We explore the notion of Torah being free and teaching Torah should have no compensation according to the RAMBAM.

Chagigah 6: Mesorah

For the source text click/tap here: Chagigah 6

To download, click/tap here: PDF

Rabbi Yishmael says: General statements were said at Sinai, i.e., Moses received general mitzvot at Sinai, including the Ten Commandments.

And the details of the mitzvot, e.g., the particulars of the sacrificial process, were said to Moses at a later time in the Tent of Meeting.

Rabbi Akiva says: Both general statements and the details of mitzvot were said at Sinai and later repeated in the Tent of Meeting, and reiterated a third time by Moses to the Jewish people in the plains of Moab, as recorded in the book of Deuteronomy.

This idea of the mesorah and revelation at Sinai being a process rather than a singular event is explored by scholars from different denominations in our essay.

This bears on the authority of tradition in subsequent generations and the power of the poseik.

Chagigah 5: הַסְתָּרָה תּוֹךְ הַסְתָּרָה

For the source text click/tap here: Chagigah 5

To download, click/tap here: PDF

The Gemora continues to explain the verse about the troubles besetting Bnai Yisrael, which is followed by a verse in which Hashem says that His anger will burn on that day, and He will abandon them, and hide His face from them, letting them be consumed. Rav Bardela bar Tivyomi quotes Rav saying that anyone who doesn't experience a hiding of Hashem's face and being consumed is not part of Bnai Yisrael.

Finally, he cried when he reached the verse which says that Hash-m will punish the people with afflictions that cannot be remedied (Devarim 31:21), because the remedy for one problem intensifies another problem.

Perhaps Rebbi Yochanan was sensitive to these particular verses because of his personal experiences. The Gemara in Berachos (5b) relates that Rebbi Yochanan lost ten sons but did not despair. He accepted the tragedies as Yisurin Shel Ahavah.

These themes of justified vs unjustified suffering permeate the theme of our dad.

We explore the writings of Rabbi Kalonymus Kalmish Shapira, the Rebbe of Piaseczno, who composed "Esh Kodesh," an extraordinary collection of sermons, in the Warsaw Ghetto during the Holocaust. This work is outstanding in its honesty, its power, and its religious and existential depths, especially considering the impossible and nightmarish circumstances of its writing.

Rebbe Nachman writes on the hiddenness of God using the same prooftext from Deut 321:21

Chagigah 4: Imbecile שׁוֹטֶה

For the source text click/tap here: Chagigah 4

To download, click/tap here:  PDF

We mentioned that a deranged person does not have to appear in the Temple, as well as do any other mitzvah. Who is considered deranged? - One who goes alone at night to uninhabited places, sleeps in a cemetery, and tears his clothes for no reason. Do we need him to do all three?

Rav Huna and Rebbi Yochanan disagree about how many of these signs a person must display in order to be classified as a Shoteh.

Rav Huna says that one is not classified as a Shoteh until he performs all three strange actions. Rebbi Yochanan disagrees and says that a person has the status of a Shoteh even when he performs only one of the three actions.

We explore the notion of insanity, and the halachic dispensations thereof as well as the more recent implications of imbecility in western culture.

Chagigah 3: Hakhel

For the source text click/tap here: Chagigah 3

To download, click/tap here: PDF

A passage on our daf is quoted in the name of Rabbi Elazar ben Azaria, expounds the pasuk (Devarim 31:12) which describes how every Jewish person – man, woman and child – is obligated to travel to Jerusalem once in seven years for the mitzvah of hakhel (assembly).

While the men and women come to learn and to listen, what is the purpose of bringing children?

Rabbi Elazar ben Azaria explains that it is so that extra reward can be given to those who bring them.

We bring a number of commentators who attempt to explain this unique halachah, including the radical teaching of the Mei hashiloach Reb Mordechai Leiner the Izhbitzer Rebbe.